Challenging the Party Line
By Murray
Polner
Peter Bernard is an American Jewish writer who attends an Orthodox
synagogue. In The Crisis of Zionism (Henry
Holt) he breaks ranks with the long-established American Jewish guardians of
everything Israel
does and says about war, peace and justice.
A former New Republic editor and now Daily
Beast blogger/writer and City
University of New York professor, his book was preceded by his earlier
essay “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment” in the New York Review of Books, where he wrote
“In the American Jewish establishment today, the language of liberal
Zionism—with its idioms of human rights, equal citizenship, and territorial
compromise has been drained of meaning.”
Beinart takes aim at growing anti-democratic
practices inside Netanyahu’s Israel
(more thoroughly covered in Gershom Gorenberg’s withering Israel Unmasked) and how the wealthy,
politically sophisticated organized American Jewish community—by no means a
majority of American Jews-- has set out to silence any and all criticism of Israel.
Beinart’s book will no doubt be assailed by them as encouraging anti-Semitism
and growing (at least as they see it) anti-Israel voices that could persuade
some to question their party line. (Jack Ross’s brilliant Rabbi Outcast, largely ignored by reviewers, tracks the history of long-forgotten, largely rabbinic, American
anti-Zionism). Beinart also wonders why so many non-Orthodox American Jews,
most of whom are unaffiliated with any Jewish groups and who gave Obama 78% of
their vote in 2008, remain silent, giving free reign for Israel’s unquestioning defenders to
denounce critics.
Perhaps that’s why Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to the U.S. Congress in May 2011 received
twenty-nine standing ovations from both sides of the aisle. It was as if the
Messiah had finally arrived, at least in Washington.
In March 2012 he was again hailed as he arrived in the U.S. hoping to force the U.S. into attacking Iran,
which he charged was building a nuclear bomb and was an “existential” threat to
Israel.
According to Beinart, older American Jewish organizations have, in
addition to fighting anti-Semitism, abandoned their historic defense of working
people, minority rights, civil liberties and democracy. Now it is Israel
almost all the time. It was the late Rabbi Alexander Schindler, a former U.S.
10th Mountain Division ski paratrooper who earned a Bronze Star and
Purple Heart during WWII and later became head of Reform Jewry’s largest religious
organization, who early on criticized the transformation to a “kidney machine,”
which was designed to reinforce the attachment to Israel and keep the checks
rolling in.
By concentrating primarily on Israel’s
welfare and policies, says Beinart, the American donor is “contributing to a
public Jewish tragedy. What he is buying for Israel,
with his check, is American indifference—indifference to Palestinian suffering
and indifference to the principles of Israel’s declaration of independence.
When Israel subsidizes Jews to move across the green line or
imprisons Palestinians for protesting nonviolently in the West
Bank or makes it illegal to boycott settlement goods, he helps
ensure that the American government will not care.”
Today AIPAC and the Conference of President of Major American Jewish Organizations
(some of its constituent groups have few or no members), pose as the voice of American Jewry, which they
are not. Meanwhile, their sympathizers track dissenters, parsing every word,
every sentence, indeed everyone of note who dares to publicly criticize Israeli
policies. Skeptics are accused of “Delegitimizing” Israel, Christians of anti-Semitism
while Jews who think differently are assailed as “self- hating Jews.”
The late historian Tony Judt, who was Jewish, once wrote that he thought the
best solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict was a binational and secular
state. He also condemned the seizure of Palestinian lands in the West Bank. For this and other offenses he was denied the
right to speak when two influential organizational figures intimidated his hosts
into withdrawing their invitations. Playwright Tony Kushner was almost denied
an award because one detractor found his views wanting. There are many, many more examples.
Zionism was founded as a political reaction against persistent European
antisemitism and murderous pogroms. Early
European Zionists taught it was better for Jews to have a home of their own as a
desperately needed haven. Though opposed by the Jewish Bund and non- and
anti-Zionists, (the former identified with working class socialism, the
ultra-Orthodox believing that only the Messiah’s arrival could herald a return
to the Holy Land and still others maintained Judaism was a religion, not a
political movement), Zionism’s founding fathers, many of them socialists too,
established what they hoped would become a home for world Jewry. Israel’s
Jewish population has since been augmented with the arrival of Holocaust
survivors and Sephardic and Russian immigrants. But after the capture of the West Bank in 1967 and the influx of Jewish settlers, now
numbering some 400,000, democracy is under attack by right-wingers and
extremists.
As a result, anti-democratic trends within Israel and the West Bank, concludes
Beinart, “in which the illiberal Zionism beyond the green line destroys the
possibility of liberal Zionism inside it [and] not only breeds intolerance
toward Arab Israelis; it also breeds intolerance toward dissident Jewish
Israelis.”
The heart of the problem as he sees it is that Israeli and American Jews
are no longer victims. “At the core of the tragedy lies the refusal to accept
that in both America and Israel, we live in an age not of Jewish weakness, but
of Jewish power, and that without moral vigilance, Jews will abuse power just
as hideously as anyone else.”
It is hard to know what, precisely, Zionism means today. Fulfillment of biblical prophesies? A constant
reminder of the Holocaust? Encouraging non-Israeli Jews to go on aliyah? A
light unto the world? Or has the world’s first Zionist nation become no more than
just another armed colonial power controlling an unwilling subject people, and
thus emptying Zionism of any meaning or purpose?
Beinart and many other American Jewish critics will not easily be ostracized
or silenced. Nor can an increasing
number of newer American Jewish groups such as J Street, American Friends of Peace Now,
B’Tselem USA, Shalom Center,
Tikkun, Jewish Voices for Peace as well as an army of informed Internet
bloggers.
Though Beinart will be personally attacked, his compelling book deserves
to be widely read and publicly and vigorously debated.
Murray Polner, a book reviewer for the History News Network.org, was
editor of Present Tense, a magazine
published by the American Jewish Committee from 1973-1990. His books include Rabbi: The American Experience; No
Victory Parades: The Return of the Vietnam Veteran; with Thomas Wood, Jr., We Who Dared To Say No To War; and with
Stefan Merken, Peace, Justice and Jews.
No comments:
Post a Comment